Showing posts with label Tech. Show all posts

5,000 People Applied For 100 Seats On Greenwich"s Driverless Shuttle

A prototype autonomous shuttle bus is being tested in Greenwich, and apparently the public is super excited to try it out.


Called GATEway (Greenwich Automated Transport Environment), the computer-driven shuttle can go up to a thrilling 10mph, and rides a two-mile path along the river near The O2. There’s a representative from Oxbotica, the company behind the shuttle, on every ride in case something goes wrong.



Oxbotica offered 100 places to the public to try out the shuttle, and the BBC reports that more than 5,000 people applied for them. Presumably these people didn’t realise they can also ride the driverless DLR nearby.


The test rides will take place within the next month, and Oxbotica hopes NooNoo – sorry, GATEway – will become part of the London transport ecosystem within the next couple of years. [BBC]


More London Posts:






By Holly Brockwell on 04 Apr 2017 at 9:30AM







By Holly Brockwell on 04 Apr 2017 at 6:30AM



New Alien: Covenant Footage Teases the Grim Fate of Noomi Rapace"s Prometheus Character

We’ve known for a while that Noomi Rapace would be reprising her role as Prometheus’ Liz Shaw in Covenant—but now a rather oblique piece of viral marketing seems to have dropped a big hint about her appearance in the film.


Last night, Fox dropped a new TV spot for the movie, set to John Denver’s classic “Take Me Home, Country Roads.” Check it out:



It doesn’t offer that much new, but the quick flash of a hashtag at the end—#emoh_em_ekat—takes you to a similarly-named Instagram account, which has an extended bit of footage from the TV spot.


Not only do we get to see Shaw’s name on those ominously dangling tags from the earlier trailers, we also seemingly get to see a hologram of Shaw herself, at the controls of the mysterious Engineer ship the Covenant crew discover, singing along to Denver’s tune. Considering we don’t see a body on the ship, there doesn’t appear to be much hope for seeing Rapace’s character again safe and sound. You can even see a tiny glimpse of what appears to be a Xenomorph tail appear behind her hologram in the footage, so it seems like poor Dr. Shaw got taken out by the new film’s beast.


Alien: Covenant hits cinemas May 19th.



More Movies Posts:







By Beth Elderkin on 03 Apr 2017 at 10:30AM








By Tom Pritchard on 03 Apr 2017 at 6:00AM








By Gizmodo UK on 02 Apr 2017 at 1:30PM








By Evan Narcisse on 31 Mar 2017 at 11:30AM



This New Amber Discovery Is Like the Start of Jurassic Park but With Ancient Monkeys

A tick sucks some monkey blood. A monkey’s grooming partner picks the tick off. The tick lands in some sap. The whole thing fossilises. Scientists discover the cells inside the tick in the amber. They turn the blood cells into monkey clones and you’ve essentially got some sort of Jurassic Park in real life.


That might actually be happening after one well-known scientist’s amber discovery. Except for the cloning and Jurassic Park part.


A scientist at Oregon State University thinks he’s found that same tick full of monkey blood—these would be the oldest fossilised mammalian blood cells. The sample also contained the only fossilised examples of a certain parasite that still infects humans and animals today.


The researcher was George Poinar Jr., the entomologist who came up with the entire idea of extracting DNA from amber that Jurassic Park is based on. He obtained the sample from the Cordillera Septentrional mountain range in the Dominican Republic. He started by polishing the amber so he could see the gorged 2.5 millimetre tick inside, then cracked it open like a wonder ball and viewed it under a microscope, where he found blood cells naturally stained by the chemicals in the amber.


This likely dashed his hopes of turning it into a cool cane, all for the sake of science.



The blood cells (Image: George Poinar Jr)


Poinar also found parasites inside the tick called piroplasms, which are still responsible for the tick-borne, blood cell-infecting disease babesiosis today.


Poinar has reason to believe that the tick came from monkeys grooming each other thanks to puncture marks on the tick indicating to him that something had picked it off. The size of the blood cells, and the type of animals that lived in the Dominican Republic at the time also added clues, and he published these results in the Journal of Medical Entomology.


The idea that the cells came from monkeys is mainly speculation, given the fact that there isn’t definitive proof, just lots of connected hints presented in the paper’s discussion section—the part where authors are allowed to speculate.


It’s unlikely that the blood cells will be cloned into monkeys to inhabit some sort of Paleogene Park, since, well, amber doesn’t preserve DNA all that well, according to a paper on bees preserved in amber published in the journal PLOS One.


Also, a park full of monkeys would really be a lot less exciting than one full of dinosaurs, I think. [Oregon State University]


More Science Posts:







By Ryan F. Mandelbaum on 04 Apr 2017 at 5:00PM








By George Dvorsky on 04 Apr 2017 at 9:00AM








By Rae Paoletta on 03 Apr 2017 at 10:00PM








By Andrew Liszewski on 03 Apr 2017 at 4:00PM



An Overhauled MacPro Is Finally Coming Next Year, No Matter What Anybody Thinks

Four years after the launch of the trashcan shaped MacPro, Apple has finally, slyly, announced a new MacPro. The news comes via John Gruber of Daring Fireball:



Apple is currently hard at work on a “completely rethought” Mac Pro, with a modular design that can accommodate high-end CPUs and big honking hot-running GPUs, and which should make it easier for Apple to update with new components on a regular basis.



This is undoubtedly good news for Apple fans who need a powerful machine and don’t have the time or energy to build it themselves. Over the last decade, Apple’s desktop line has often languished, but each eventual refresh has revealed a machine too powerful for the average user. Aspirational machines most of us have zero use for.


But the new MacPro isn’t coming this year. As Gruber notes, Apple is merely announcing the product, through five reporters (Gruber, Matthew Panzarino, Lance Ulanoff, Ina Fried, and John Paczkowski) in order to placate old MacPro fans who are eager for an upgrade and may even be eyeing sleek machines from Dell and HP (or plotting to build their own).


But why was Apple even forced to placate fans? When any nerd with a credit card can go build their own PC in an afternoon, why is Apple going to take five years to build a new damn machine?


The problem lies in the war of form versus function that rests at the heart of Apple’s design ethos. While successful compromise has been found, repeatedly, in the laptop space, and, reportedly, in the all-in-one space (Gruber also mentioned a new redesigned iMac is expected later this year) Apple has never quite cracked the code when it comes to desktops.


It either builds big, stunning towers like the iconic G5, or it builds tiny over-designed pieces of art like the G4 Cube and 2013 MacPro. Apple has yet to find a middle ground and develop a machine that is as upgradeable as desktops demand to be, while still being as smartly designed as Apple’s lineup has traditionally been.


And, at least according to Phil Schiller, VP of Worldwide Marketing for Apple, that compromise might still be far in the future. This quote from his conversation with Gruber is a particular standout:



We’re not going to get into exactly what stage we’re in, just that we told the team to take the time to do something really great. To do something that can be supported for a long time with customers with updates and upgrades throughout the years. We’ll take the time it takes to do that. The current Mac Pro, as we’ve said a few times, was constrained thermally and it restricted our ability to upgrade it. And for that, we’re sorry to disappoint customers who wanted that, and we’ve asked the team to go and re-architect and design something great for the future that those Mac Pro customers who want more expandability, more upgradability in the future. It’ll meet more of those needs.



Whatever is coming next from Apple will have the expandability desktop users demand, but it certainly sounds like some of the clutch Apple design may be sacrificed in the process. [Daring Fireball]


More Apple Posts:







By Gary Cutlack on 04 Apr 2017 at 1:00PM








By Christina Warren on 31 Mar 2017 at 7:00PM








By Holly Brockwell on 31 Mar 2017 at 1:00PM








By Gizmodo Australia on 28 Mar 2017 at 5:30PM



Newcastle Odeon Refuses To Go Down Without A Fight

Newcastle’s Pilgrim Street Odeon has taken its final curtain call – and went out in true dramatic style by collapsing into the road.


It’s been undergoing demolition since January, the local Chronicle reports, but late last night decided it wasn’t going without a bang. A big one, presumably, as its frontage wobbled and fell, blocking the road.




However, the cleanup effort has been swift and successful:



This is what the Odeon, formerly known as the Paramount, looked like in 1995:


Image: NewcastleLibraries via FlickrCC

We hear it’s being replaced with a building called ‘The Netflix.’



More Film Posts:






By James O Malley on 01 Apr 2017 at 7:41AM







By Adam Clark Estes on 28 Mar 2017 at 7:00PM







By Rhett Jones on 28 Mar 2017 at 4:30PM



Rare Images Suggest Thunderstorms In Space Are Even Weirder Than We Thought

Lightning is a beautiful but dangerous beast: While we’re pretty good at observing it from the ground—and occasionally, being struck by it—there’s still some mystery about how the electrical discharges in the upper layers of our atmosphere actually work. The names given to these discharges (e.g. red sprites, pixies, elves) sound like the musings of a Dungeons & Dragons zealot rather than legitimate scientific phenomena. But at long last, scientists have been able to study images and video of one these elusive happenings—called blue jets—and the results are as spellbinding as lightning itself.


On a 10-day trip aboard the International Space Station (ISS) back in September 2015, Denmark’s first astronaut—Andreas Morgensen—helmed a project around studying lightning, aptly named Thor. He was able to capture images of some of the rarest electrical storm phenomena, including this video of a massive storm above India, where elusive blue jets can be seen. Blue jets are columns of electrical discharge that fan out above cloud tops and disappear after a few tenths of a second, and yeah—we have no idea why they’re blue.


While the video has been circulating for about two years, recently, a team of scientists published their research on these blue jets in the Geophysical Research Letters. Some scientists have been sceptical to accept blue jets as legitimate occurrences, since they hang out above clouds, making them difficult to observe. But according to these researchers, Morgensen’s work gives us the first ever glimpse at a pulsating blue jet reaching 40 km.


“We have ruled out the possibility that the discharges are scattered light from lightning flashes inside the cloud since all of these are observed to have a relatively weak blue component,” the team wrote. “The observation of blue surface discharges with these characteristics is, to our knowledge, the first of its kind.”



The research shows that these images are a good starting point for understanding how blue jets and other disturbances in the stratosphere could affect Earth’s radiation balance. Later this year, NASA will send an observation facility called Atmosphere-Space Interactions Monitor (ASIM) to the ISS in order to study upper atmospheric storms and their impact on Earth’s climate. While it’s not as catchy—or cool—as “Thor,” ASIM will provide scientists with much-needed information on these bad and beautiful phenomena. Still a win in my book. [ESA, Geophysical Research Letters]


More Space Posts:






By Maddie Stone on 31 Mar 2017 at 9:30PM







By Rae Paoletta on 28 Mar 2017 at 9:30PM







By Ryan F. Mandelbaum on 28 Mar 2017 at 8:30PM







By Rae Paoletta on 28 Mar 2017 at 5:00PM



Rogue One"s First Writer Got the Job in a Very Simple Way

It was a day long remembered: October 30th, 2012. The day Disney announced it had bought Lucasfilm and would be releasing new Star Wars movies. Fans everywhere immediately began freaking out about the news, but one in particular saw it as an opportunity.


That person is Gary Whitta, who previously wrote The Book of Eli and After Earth before being announced as the first writer on the first Star Wars standalone film. “I literally went from reading the news story on my phone to calling my agent and saying ‘Oh my god you gotta throw my hat in the ring,’” Whitta told io9. “Now, I’m sure every writer in town was doing the same thing. I never seriously thought I’d get in that room.”


Get in the room he did. Whitta told us that he later was summoned to a secret, very general meeting at Lucasfilm. “There was no talk of Rogue One or Death Star plans or anything like that,” Whitta said. “Lucasfilm is a little like the CIA. They’re very, very secretive. So I had the meeting and thought, that’s it. I didn’t think anything was going to come out of it.”


That was, until, he got sent a document. In the document was John Knoll’s story pitch for what would become Rogue One, about the Rebels who stole the original Death Star plans. “I thought that was a great idea,” Whitta said. “And John is brilliant, but he’s not a screenwriter, so they needed a writer to come in and take what he started and flesh it out into a full story. Why they hired me, I still couldn’t tell you.”


He has one idea, though. It happened in the second meeting after he’d read Knoll’s document. “I told him, ‘This movie reminds me a bit of Zero Dark Thirty,’” Whitta said, citing the strong female characters, on the ground, in a war zone, on a crucially important mission. “The moment I said that I saw a bit of recognition in John. He nodded, and I thought ‘I said something right there.’”


Later, after being hired, Whitta saw the PowerPoint presentation Knoll created to pitch the idea to Lucasfilm president Kathleen Kennedy. “There was a ton of Zero Dark Thirty footage in there,” Whitta said. “So I did say the right thing. I made the right reference, and maybe that’s one of the reasons why they felt I had the same sensibility for what the film would be as john’s original vision was.”


Though Whitta wrote the first drafts of the script, he got a “story by” credit with Knoll in the final film, while Chris Weitz and Tony Gilroy got the screenwriting credit. This doesn’t bother him, though, because he explains that with a movie this size, the more talent they can throw at it, the better.


“I think of Rogue One like a relay race,” Whitta explains. “John ran the first leg. He handed the baton to me and I ran the second leg. Then as I started to get exhausted and run out of steam I handed the baton to Chris. Then Chris runs his leg and makes his contribution, which is a huge contribution as he created Chirrut, Baze, and Bodhi, and then he takes it to Tony who takes it over the finish line.”


“You’re grateful to work with talented people,” Whitta concluded. “Plus no one knows who did what. You just see the four names on the screen.”


And for Whitta that started with nothing but a timely telephone call.


Rogue One is on digital download now. It’s on Blu-ray April 4th.



More Star wars Posts:







By Beth Elderkin on 03 Apr 2017 at 11:30AM



Chemistry Should Only Be Taught Using Gorgeous Microscopic Footage of Chemical Reactions

Hands-on experiments can make studying chemistry slightly more enjoyable, but the bulk of the learning usually comes from a massive and boring textbook. Maybe the world would have more aspiring chemists if lessons were instead taught using these microscopic videos of chemical reactions happening right before your eyes.


The Beauty of Science created Precipitation3, a short film captured through the eye of a microscope revealing multiple chemical reactions where liquid solutions become solids—or precipitates. There are eight reactions in total, including the two highlighted above during which silver nitrate and potassium chromate produce silver chromate, and chromium chloride and sodium carbonate combine to create chromium carbonate… Like we said, just watch the video. It’s far more enjoyable. [Vimeo via Boing Boing]
[embedded content]

Bidding Website Rentberry May Be the Startup of Your Nightmares

Rentberry has been operating in test cities and angering affordable housing advocates since 2016. But with its new expansion into 1,000 cities in the United States, the rental bidding website is about to piss off a lot more people.


Alex Lubinksy, founder of Rentberry, seems to be pursuing an image that’s closer to Uber’s vilified Travis Kalanick than the do-gooder model of Elon Musk. Lubinsky courts the controversy that surrounds his startup and is known to include negative press when communicating his vision to reporters. But one big difference with Rentberry will be that if it takes off and becomes the new standard for renting apartments, most of its customers won’t be able to run a #deleteRentberry campaign because landlords will have the control.


The website essentially functions as a cross between CraigsList and eBay. A landlord lists a rental space and potential tenants bid against one another to claim the lease. Tenants’ personal information is available to the landlord. The landlord then makes their final decision by weighing what the best offer is along with which bidder seems like they’d be the best tenant. For now, Rentberry charges users a $25 (£20) fee, but in the future, it plans to charge 25 per cent of the difference between the asking price and the agreed upon rent. Whoever received the better deal pays the fee—every month.


Lubinsky sees this as good for everyone. While the rents in competitive markets like San Francisco and New York City will likely go up, he believes that the invisible hand of the market will lower rents in areas that have less demand. When he initially started pitching landlords in San Francisco to use the service he claimed that it would raise rents by 5 per cent. In San Francisco and San Jose that claim turned out to be true. But now that more data is in and the company is facing anger from the public, he’s walking that figure back. He tells the Wall Street Journal that the system has actually lowered rents:



Tenants on Rentberry have actually saved 5.1% on rent compared with what landlords asked, Mr. Lubinsky now says, based on calculations across all transactions on Rentberry’s site, in the 10 cities where Rentberry has been active to date. These savings were possible because Rentberry allows tenants to make offers that are lower or higher than the posted rent. It probably helps that, nationwide, there’s an oversupply of apartments, says Toby Bozzuto, chief executive of the Bozzuto Group, which manages 60,000 apartments in the U.S.



It’s tough to say how those numbers will change with Rentberry’s nationwide expansion. According to the 2015 U.S. census, 62.7 per cent of Americans live in cities. So, the majority of people in this country live in areas where landlords are well aware of the legitimate market value of their properties. That same census found that rental households have hit a 50 year high. This is in part because of the 2008 housing crisis and underwater homeowners being forced to join the rental pool.


Leah Simon-Weisberg, legal director for Tenants Together, a nonprofit dedicated to tenant advocacy across California, told City Lab that Rentberry is like the price gauging-Martin Shkreli of startups. “I think it’s incredibly arrogant and incredibly concerning in light of the fact that we have the highest number of homeless families since the Great Depression,” she said. “For them to do something to increase the rents seems really callous.”


At the time that he came under fire for raising the price of an HIV drug by 4,000 per cent, Shkreli characterised his move as “altruistic.” Likewise, Lubinski claims to be doing a great, capitalistic public service. “Equilibrium will happen,” he told San Jose Inside. “All this does is balance supply and demand. People already bid offline, but nobody sees it.”


Rentberry will still have to convince landlords across the nation that this is a better deal for them. Many of them will remain wary of changing their ways and many like to get to know their tenants a bit first. But, the ease of having background checks already complete and the possibility of higher rents than expected could prove enticing.


And Rentberry isn’t the only one to see the potential in this business model. Competitors like Biddwell are also coming up, ensuring that this idea won’t live or die with just one startup.


Daniel DeBolt, a spokesman for the Mountain View Tenants Coalition told San Jose Inside that these companies are just normalising the idea that we should all bid up rents. “Just because you can make money off the housing crisis, it doesn’t mean you should,” he said. [Wall Street Journal, BBC, San Jose Inside, City Lab]

10 Banned, Censored, And Controversial Movies That Are Now Cult Classics

Recently, we shared a clip from Ken Russell’s The Devils, a racy 1971 horror film that’s finally available for streaming on Shudder after years of obscurity. That got us thinking about other cult movies once deemed so scandalous they were either censored, banned, or taken out of circulation for years.


Some of these films have remained off-the-radar curiosities, more famous for causing controversy than anything else. Some of them have since received souped-up theatrical and Blu-ray releases. Some have even been put through the Hollywood remake machine. But all of them retain a certain amount of shock value that’s still potent even today. (A warning, many of the trailers are NSFW.)


1) Freaks (1932)



After he made Dracula with Bela Lugosi, director Tod Browning tackled the movie that basically ruined his career. Freaks — inspired in part by Browning’s own teenage years with a travelling circus — famously features real sideshow performers like conjoined twins Daisy and Violet Hilton, and “human torso” Prince Randian, whose ability to light a cigarette despite having no arms or legs has its own featured vignette (glimpsed in the trailer, above). Censors were aghast — the film’s original running time was trimmed by nearly a third — and though Browning’s intention was to offer sympathetic portrayals of the film’s so-called “freaks,” audiences were horrified for all the wrong reasons. Over time, of course, it’s become a respected cult classic, preserved for posterity by the Library of Congress, and elevated to a punk touchstone by the Ramones (“Gabba gabba hey!”) Even more importantly, Freaks occupies a specific niche that literally no other film will ever fill.


2) A Clockwork Orange (1971)



Stanley Kubrick’s iconic adaptation of Anthony Burgess’ dystopian novel initially received an X-rating in America, and it was removed from circulation in the United Kingdom after being blamed for a handful of crimes that supposedly took cues from its scenes of rape and “ultra-violence.” That said, it was also a box-office hit, and scored Oscar nominations for Best Picture, Best Director, Best Adapted Screenplay, and Best Editing. Even today, watching it brings forth equally strong feelings of distress (for the subject matter) and admiration (for Malcolm McDowell’s performance and Kubrick’s masterful presentation).


3) The Last House on the Left (1972)



Long before Scream and A Nightmare on Elm Street, Wes Craven made his feature debut with this low-budget horror film inspired by a surprisingly highbrow source: Ingmar Bergman’s The Virgin Spring. Even still, Last House was initially banned in the United Kingdom, then released in carefully edited versions for decades after its original release. It’s not hard to see why — the film is violent in some exceptionally horrible ways. Naive teenager Mari and her slightly more streetwise best friend make the fatal mistake of trying to buy weed from a gang led by a brutal escaped convict; later, the gang makes the fatal mistake of falling into the clutches of Mari’s parents, who are hellbent on revenge. Many of the scenes are very difficult to watch. But there’s also an oddball sense of humour that bubbles up between the grime, as well as a weirdly catchy folk-rock soundtrack contributed by David Hess, who plays Krug, the main villain.


4) Pink Flamingos (1972)



John Waters’ gloriously trashy early-career entry made censors nervous for being sexually explicit and for featuring a scene in which iconic star Divine, playing “the filthiest person alive,” eats dog poop, among other reasons. However, that proudly transgressive content — and the fact that the campy script and performances are flat-out hilarious — are precisely why Pink Flamingos will forever be one of cinema’s most beloved cult movies.


5) The Texas Chain Saw Massacre (1974)



Today, Tobe Hooper’s Texas Chain Saw Massacre is not just a cult classic — it’s one of the horror genre’s most revered films. It’s one of the first scary movies to claim to be based on a true story (which it wasn’t, though certain aspects of it were inspired by real-life grave-robbing murderer Ed Gein), and despite its nightmare-inducing title, a lot of its violent scenes are shaped more by clever editing than special effects. The title alone is enough to put censors on high alert, and it was initially banned in multiple countries. Copies of the film are now as easy to come by as barbecue in Texas, and other filmmakers have been enthusiastically ripping it off for over 40 years, but it’s still scary as hell.


6) I Spit On Your Grave (1978)



After a big-city writer who travels to the country for some peace and quiet is horrifically gang-raped by a pack of leering locals, she gets revenge by gruesomely murdering each of her assailants. Originally titled Day of the Woman, writer-director Meir Zarchi’s brutal film was initially received with disgust — but has since been reappraised with appreciation for its (sorta) feminist themes, despite its unavoidable torture-porn leanings. Interestingly, star Camille Keaton and Zarchi married after the film’s release (they divorced in 1982). And the film’s controversial elements didn’t hamper the film’s enduring popularity; I Spit On Your Grave was remade in 2010, and both the original and rebooted versions spawned two sequels.


7) Monty Python’s Life of Brian (1979)



The legendary British comedy troupe’s irreverent take on Jesus ruffled the features of multiple humorless religious groups, as this contemporaneous report from The Guardian recounts:



The Catholic archdiocese of New York, plus three distinguished Jewish organisations – the Rabbinical Alliance of America, the Union of Orthodox Rabbis and the Council of Syria and Near Eastern Sephardic Communities – have condemned the film.


The Catholic archdiocese has called Life of Brian a “blasphemy”, adding that it was a “crime against religion which holds the person of Christ up to comic ridicule.”


The Jewish groups are equally damning. They regard the film as “grievously insulting,” and have described it as “a vicious attack on Judaism and the Bible, and a cruel mockery of Christian religious feelings as well.” The three Jewish organisations speak for more than 1,000 rabbis.



However, looking on the bright side — as the song suggests — the film was a hit with comedy fans. It may not inspire quite as much reverence as 1975’s Monty Python and the Holy Grail, but it’s still funny as hell.


8) Cannibal Holocaust (1980)



Look, you know if you’re sitting down to watch something called Cannibal Holocaust, you’re in for something viciously unpleasant that’s going to make you lose your lunch. Director Ruggero Deodato didn’t make the first cannibal movie — a genre lovingly perfected by Italian exploitation filmmakers — but he did make the most infamous one, packed with shocking racism as well as animal and human torture that looks alarmingly realistic (and animals really were killed on camera, though despite all appearances, humans were not). Adding to that realism is the fact that Cannibal Holocaust is one of the earliest found-footage horror films, presented as the last documentary made by a crew that went missing after some very bad behaviour deep in the Amazon jungle. Widely banned for a number of reasons — animal cruelty was obviously a big one — Cannibal Holocaust is now probably the ultimate feel-bad midnight movie staple.


9) Maniac (1980)



William Lustig’s legendary slasher film about a mannequin-obsessed mama’s boy is buoyed by an equally legendary performance by Joe Spinell, who also co-wrote the script. Special effects master Tom Savini has a memorable cameo as a disco dude whose head is reduced to splatter by the titular terror’s shotgun. That death scene isn’t even the grossest thing in Maniac, which also contains scenes of scalping and is just generally one of the sleaziest grindhouse movies ever made. Naturally, it required major editing to get an R-rating, and was banned in the United Kingdom for years. A 2012 remake starring Elijah Wood took the stylistic risk of being almost entirely shot from the killer’s POV, and was banned in New Zealand because of its “tacit invitation to enjoy cruel and violent behaviour through its first-person portrayal and packaging as entertainment.” Of course, only time will tell if the newer version achieves the cult-movie heights of the original.


10) Roar



In this legendary oddity from director-writer-star Noel Marshall (co-starring his then-wife Tippi Hedren and her daughter Melanie Griffith) — a film intended to convey a message of animal conservation — the cranky big-cat stars really attacked the cast and crew, resulting in dozens of hideous real-life injuries. “The most dangerous movie ever made,” indeed, and the proof is right there up on the screen. A 2015 Alamo Drafthouse re-release (dig the trailer, with just a few of the broken bones and whatnot tallied up, above) cemented Roar‘s place in the cult pantheon.

Who Needs CGI? Photographer Builds His Own Slick, Miniature Scenes

By Logan Booker


Being on location isn’t always possible as a photographer, so what can you do instead? Bring the location to you, of course. Or build it… in miniature. Camera maestro Vatsal Kataria has been refining two crafts at the same time — one behind the lens and the other behind a paintbrush — to create (and snap) tiny replica scenes featuring everything from cars to helicopters.


As Kataria explains to PetaPixel’s Michael Zhang, the main impetus was to just try things out, rather than any commercial demands:



“I started miniature photography as an experiment but slowly and slowly I learned a lot in this genre,” Kataria tells PetaPixel. “My motive is to encourage everyone that you can be creative and great photographer — it’s not just expensive gear and props.”



Kataria goes on to say that he does his best to build everything from scratch, “making them in the cheapest way possible”.


Image: Vatsal Kataria


Image: Vatsal Kataria


Image: Vatsal Kataria



[Vatsal Kataria, via PetaPixel]

No, The Daily Show Didn"t Get Hacked

Recently, the broadcast of The Daily Show – which you can watch on Comedy Central UK – was briefly interrupted by a blip of stock war footage, a spinning ballerina, and a web address with a Russian domain name. The internet quickly assumed that the late night comedy show had been hacked. It wasn’t.
Read more at https://www.gizmodo.com.au/2017/04/no-the-daily-show-didnt-get-hacked/#xvsLP3OWWVxKHW2s.99



Simply put this was a dumb publicity stunt designed to play on the fears surrounding the ongoing investigation into Russia’s interference with the 2016 US Presidential election. The domain name that briefly appeared in the Mr. Robot-ish moment was thepresidentshow.ru which just leads to this Twitter account. There are three tweets in Russian that translate to:


  • Make night late again

  • Great things to come!

  • Make tv great again!

If that’s not obvious enough, a quick look at who owns the domain name shows that it was registered on March 29th by Viacom, Comedy Central’s parent company.



Haha, you get it? It’s hilarious because Russia and hacking and Trump.


The Daily Show has been in a bit of a creative slump since Jon Stewart left and this little stunt reeks of desperation. But aside from it just not being funny, it’s also irresponsible. I hate to go clutching my pearls here but we have a really screwed up environment right now when it comes to this legitimate issue. Stuff like this isn’t helping. Xenophobic responses to all things Russian are bad. The fact that the left is taking every new nugget of info as gospel is bad.


The fact that the right is dismissing the issue is bad. And the fact that the American House Intelligence Committee investigation into the matter has become a joke is bad.


All one needs to do is look at Twitter to see that a lot of people will just make their assumptions, let it feed into their paranoia, and never look into what the hell really happened. So yeah, The Daily Show/Viacom did something stupid. You can see it below.


Excalibur Is An Airbender In Craziest King Arthur: Legend Of The Sword Trailer Yet

The legend of Excalibur isn’t always the most consistent. Sometimes it’s the Sword in the Stone, sometimes it’s a gift from the Lady of the Lake. In any case, I’m pretty sure none of the legends gave King Arthur magical air powers.


The final trailer for Guy Ritchie’s stylised medieval epic King Arthur: Legend of the Sword is here, and holy hell I’m going to love and hate this movie in equal measure. It looks absolutely bonkers. Charlie Hunnam keeps angrily punching the air, Jude Law is in full DGAF mode, and there are war elephants the size of skyscrapers (at least I think it’s an elephant).


As someone who willingly watched the living tragedy that is Gods of Egypt, I can tell this movie is going to bring me so much masochistic delight.



The trailer does give us more plot points that we didn’t really have before. For example, this version’s Arthur wasn’t raised in the countryside by Sir Ector… he grew up in a brothel (because we’ve gotta show those sexy ladies, amiright?).


We also see proof of Vortigern’s powers, which could be linked to the aforementioned stadium-sized war elephants. 300 can suck it with their pitiful normal-sized elephants. We’re in Arthur’s world now.


You can check out the trailer below, and be grateful that not everything on April Fool’s Day is fake. Some things are too glorious to make up.


You Have No Idea How Mysterious Whale Vaginas Are

Whale vaginas are an enigma.


That’s because research on cetacean genitalia (dolphins and whales are both cetaceans) is pretty biased towards penis-havers. Comparatively less work has been done studying cetacean lady-bits. So, a team of scientists decided to break down the cetatriarchy in order to really understand these poorly-explored parts.


As it turns out, cetacean vaginas have unusual folds with unknown functions that differ between species. In order to really get deep into what’s going on here, the researchers collected 59 cetacean reproductive tracts from twenty species of cetaceans that had washed ashore and died of natural causes. They sliced the parts up, and measured and counted the vaginal folds.


The researchers found lots of interesting tidbits about the porpoise parts: the average vaginal length was 21 centimeters in their specimens, though the length scaled with the size of the animal. This might not sound surprising, but it actually hadn’t been established — genital size is far more often studied in male cetaceans and male mammals in general.


Let me repeat this last point. There wasn’t enough data to compare cetacean vaginal length, because scientists spend all their time measuring penises instead.


There’s actually a reason for that, though.


“We know a lot less about vaginal morphology in general than we know about penile morphology,” said Diane Kelly, assistant research professor at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst who used to blog about sex for Gizmodo. “Part of it is that penises are easy to get to. They’re out in front,” she said. “Vaginas are more complex. they’re 3D tubes with complex wall anatomy. For a long time there was this assumption that vaginas are simple — but that’s clearly not true.”


Here comes a picture of a bisected dolphin reproductive tract, because this is science and sometimes science looks like a bisected dolphin reproductive tract.


Image: Orbach et al


Incredible!!!


Like other mammalian vaginas, cetacean vaginas turn out to be very complex. Almost all of the specimens only had folds in the inner half of the vagina, but the number of folds varied between species, and the fold length didn’t scale uniformly with increasing body length.


We’re not quite sure what the folds are for, but one hypothesis was that they serve to stop water from getting into the part of the vagina where the semen goes. But other mammals that mate in water, like sea otters, don’t have these vaginal folds. The folds might also be muscles shaped to restrict which mates’ sperm make it into the upper reproductive tract, according to the study published today in the journal PLOS One.


“Ducks have these complex twisted vaginal tracts that prevent males they’re not interested in mating with or interested in fathering their offspring from getting their sperm into them,” said Kelly. “Maybe something similar is happening with these cetaceans.”


While this paper was only published yesterday, researchers are already working on the next step, trying to understand how cetacean penises and vaginas fit together. Kelly has even begun working with researchers at the penis end of the cetacean puzzle. She covered some of that work for Gizmodo back in 2015, where you can learn even more about dolphin vaginas.


Ultimately, there’s a whole lot we don’t know about cetacean vaginas. So we’re just going to have to cut open some more dead porpoise genitals, do some more studies, and hopefully, watch some whales fuck.


[PLOS One]

Is Blue Origin"s Tourist Capsule Sexier Than SpaceX"s?

The dick measuring contest space race between tech titans Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk has been brewing for years, but recently, things have intensified to comic book levels of absurdity. Almost immediately after SpaceX announced it’d be sending two private citizens around the moon next year, Jeff Bezos fired back by announcing Blue Origin’s plans to set up something akin to Amazon on the Moon. Then, earlier this week, Blue Origin dropped the first renders of the interior of its New Shepard space tourism vehicle, which it plans to start using for commercial flights as early as 2018.


Is it a coincidence that these photos went public just days before SpaceX successfully launched and landed a reusable rocket into orbital space for the first time ever? Given the space tycoons’ track records, unlikely.


It’s only going to get worse from here, folks, so we might as well indulge these two grown men in their public back-and-forth. Let’s start by arguing about which company has the sexier space capsule: Blue Origin or SpaceX?


For reference, here are the pictures Blue Origin dropped this week:


Image Courtesy of Blue Origin


Image Courtesy of Blue Origin


Pretty slick, right? While passengers will be able to get out of their seats and enjoy weightlessness, they’ll only be getting a taste of the spacefaring experience — New Shepard’s flights will only last about 11 minutes and only reach suborbital altitudes of 58 miles above the Earth, give or take. The big windows are admittedly a nice touch, though.


While New Shepard’s got a sweet interior, Blue Origin is way late to showing it off. SpaceX dropped renders of the interior of its Crew Dragon Capsule back in 2015:


Image: SpaceXImage: SpaceX



In my opinion, SpaceX gets bonus points for this spicy promo video. Where’s your video, Bezos???



The Crew Dragon capsule is designed to send astronauts to the International Space Station and beyond, so it makes sense that the interior mockups feature fewer windows and more functional stuff, like that alarmingly large ‘execute command’ button. Still, Elon was clearly aiming for classy, a strategy which seems to have paid off, seeing as he just secured a deposit from two rich people to take a week-long sojourn around the Moon in the Crew Dragon capsule in 2018.


It’s hard to say which is definitively sexier. From a purely aesthetic standpoint, you might feel inclined to say Blue Origin’s — but if you’re into utility, you’ve gotta go with SpaceX. The choice is yours — choose wisely and argue about it with me.

Big Trouble In Little China: The Game Looks Fan-Freaking-Tastic

We first heard about Big Trouble in Little China: The Game last winter, and this week we got a first glimpse of what the box art, game art, and — most excitingly — the miniatures will look like in the final product. Three words: Mini Egg Shen.


All images: courtesy of Boris Polonsky


The still-in-development game is designed by Chris Batarlis and Boris Polonsky, who are both obviously huge fans of John Carpenter’s cult film. Here’s a little bit more about the game from its makers:



It’s a thematic, cooperative, strategy, miniatures, adventure game that allows 1-4 players to experience the events they remember from the film as well as create new adventures of their own. The game plays in two acts: Act One uses the front side of the game board: Chinatown, while Act Two takes place on the back: Lo Pan’s lair. Players will choose from six characters, each with unique abilities, and will use custom dice for actions, quest tasks and combat. They will also be able to use the communal fate dice, which come with a fun risk/reward mechanic. After completing quests and upgrading their characters, players will move to the back of the board for the big showdown with Lo Pan! Will the heroes stop Lo Pan’s evil scheme in time, or is everything gonna go to hell?



And now for the images, starting with renderings of Gracie Law, Lightning, Rain and (my personal favourite) the Wild Man:




Here are two peeks at the game board art that anyone who’s seen Big Trouble will easily recognise:




And some of the miniatures. Alas, no glimpses of Jack Burton or Lo Pan (nor the game’s “thematic dice”) yet, but the inclusion of fan-fave character “Wing Kong Six Shooter” clearly indicates the level of detail we can expect from the finished product.






Speaking of the finished product, Big Trouble in Little China: The Game will be available for pre-order later this year; you can sign up here for updates, or check out the Facebook page.

One Day Photoshop Might Let You Instantly Copy Another Photo"s Style

Ever wonder why your photos never turn out as amazing those posted by your favorite Instagrammer? There’s probably a lot of post-processing happening in Photoshop you don’t see. But instead of poking at sliders for an hour, computer scientists want to make it incredibly easy for even amateur photographers to achieve results comparable to a professional’s.


In a paper recently posted to the arXiv pre-print server titled Deep Style Photo Transfer, Sylvain Paris and Eli Shechtman from Adobe, working with Fujun Luan and Kavita Bala from Cornell University, detail a new deep-learning approach to post-production and colour correction that can automatically apply the visual aesthetics of one photograph (lighting, colors, tone) to a completely different shot, with results that still look photorealistic.



Image-processing algorithms like this are not new, but the results often tend to have a painting-like aesthetic to them. Fine details get lost, straight lines get warped and distorted, and the color changes are applied to broad regions of an image — which is far from ideal since it requires further processing afterwards to fix mistakes.


The goal here was a cleaner one-step transformation, so the research team turned to neural networks and deep learning. They’re phrases that are thrown around a lot today when it comes to artificial intelligence, but are essential approaches to automating a complex process like this. Specifically teaching software to spot and process every possible object on Earth is impossible, but by having it make corrections to thousands of sample images, with feedback on when it’s done a good job, and when it hasn’t, over time the algorithm will adapt and learn.


Eventually, without being taught what a building is or looks like, the algorithm will automatically know that colors appearing in the sky regions of a photo shouldn’t be applied to man-made structures. The new algorithm is also designed to only make tweaks to an image’s colours and tones, so it preserves details and doesn’t produce any warping side effects.


Photos: Fujun Luan


Are the results always perfect? No. As this photo of a snowy landscape being transformed into a lush tropical valley reveals, there are some things the algorithm can’t account for. The details of a field full of plants can’t really be recreated by just colour-correcting a snow-covered plain to appear green. But the researchers have found that the algorithm works about 80 per cent of the time without the need for any manual tweaking.


Eventually, this software could make its way into Photoshop or other image processing applications, and while talented photographers probably won’t like the idea of someone being able to instantly steal their style, the practical uses of a tool like this seem to outweigh those concerns. If a client asks for a night time version of a photo that doesn’t exist, a photographer could quickly make an altered version without losing an hour making manual tweaks in Photoshop.


And at the very least, it should help up everyone’s Instagram game.


[Deep Photo Style Transfer via DPReview via PetaPixel]

Oh My God, Look at Saturn"s North Pole

Recently, Gizmodo space writer Rae Paoletta called Saturn “the golden retriever of the solar system,” and I’m not here to dispute that characterisation. But it was a lot easier to think of Saturn as a golden retriever when the planet’s defining hue was, y’know, gold. Not blue. Not electric, alien protomolecule-blue.


Some incredible new shots of the atmospheric vortex at the centre of Saturn’s north polar hexagon were captured by NASA’s Cassini spacecraft this week, and brought to our attention in a tweet by space enthusiast Jason Major. The images were snapped during the latest of Cassini’s ring-grazing orbits, which have so far yielded stunning glimpses of Saturn’s rings, and its delightfully pasta-shaped moons.


And now, this.



Major compiled the image from raw data that was posted to Cassini’s image archive yesterday. “If I see something interesting and it also happens to have been captures in visible-light colour channels, I assemble a colour version in Photoshop to see what the awesome level is,” Major told Gizmodo over Twitter DM. “That vortex pic was a 10.”


In case you were wondering, below is what the same polar vortex—a 1,250 mile-wide hurricane that sits at the centre of a much larger six-sided jet stream, often referred to as Saturn’s hexagon—looked like last October. There’s a hint of cerulean toward the centre, but if the new image (which has not been validated or calibrated by NASA) is to be believed, things have gotten a tad more dramatic up north over the past few months. Major has been documenting some of the recent changes to the vortex on his blog.
NASA/JPL-Caltech/Space Science Institute/Hampton University
This wouldn’t be the first time Saturn has displayed uncanny, chameleon-like abilities. In fact, the image above is pulled from a press release NASA issued last October, which noted a striking colour change across the entire north polar hexagon from 2012 to 2016. Here’s a GIF that illustrates its evolution over time:
Saturn’s north polar hexagon in November 2012 (blue) contrasted with October 2016 (yellow). Image: NASA/JPL-Caltech
NASA has hypothesised that the colour change between 2012 to 2016 was due to “increased production of photochemical hazes in the atmosphere as the north pole approaches summer solstice in May 2017.” In other words, as Saturn’s north pole tilted sunward, interactions between sunlight and atmospheric compounds that produce haze started increasing, changing the hexagon’s overall hue. As Kunio Sayanagi of the Cassini Imaging team noted in 2013, the hexagon acts as a particle barrier “like Earth’s ozone hole.” It’s difficult for bits of the atmosphere to cross in and out, so any chemical changes within the hexagon tend to stay within the hexagon.


At least, that’s the best explanation scientists have come up with so far. It could also be aliens, judging from the level of excitement on space Twitter.



At a talk I attended at the American Geophysical Union’s annual conference in San Francisco last December, Hampton University planetary scientist John Blalock reaffirmed that while Saturn’s north polar vortex is indeed blue, the rest of the hexagon is definitely yellow these days.


“When we look from 2012 to 2016, [the] hexagon is maybe a little brighter, but the interior and especially the doughnut region [at the centre] looks brighter,” Blalock said, adding later in the talk that the “brightening is consistent with an increase in the production of photochemical haze products in the upper atmosphere.”


I’ve reached out to Blalock and Sayanagi to see if their thinking on this matter has evolved since December, and I’ll update this post if and when I hear back. I’ve also reached out to NASA to see if the agency has any fresh thoughts on Saturn’s electrifying shade.


In the meanwhile, buckle up Earthlings, because Cassini still has another six and a half months of daredevil manoeuvres left, which promise to bring us some of the most stunning planetary portraits humanity has ever seen.

360-Degree Video Puts 4,200 Falling Dominoes All Around You

In the world of competitive dominoes, stacking 4,200 tiny plastic bricks is, surprisingly, not even close to setting any kind of record. But YouTube’s FlippyCat might have created one of the most satisfying domino falls to watch, since the entire structure was stacked around a 360-degree camera, putting you in the centre of all the destruction.


Until someone invents a camera small enough to fit inside a plastic domino, giving us a first-person view of the mayhem, this 360-degree video, which you can pan in all directions from inside the structure, might be the coolest domino video out there. [YouTube via The Awesomer]

iOS 10.3 Won"t Robocall Emergency Services Anymore

Apple released iOS 10.3 this week, and in addition to a new file system and a built-in “Find My AirPods” app, the new update also fixes a very important bug that could allow arseholes to robocall 911.


Back in October, 18-year old Meetkumar Desai was arrested after software he allegedly wrote—which allowed iPhones to continuously call 911 over and over again—resulted in attacks that overwhelmed 911 call centres across a dozen US states.


This was possible due to a flaw in iOS that would allow users to tap a phone number and immediately dial it. Desai’s software allegedly utilised this flaw—if one clicked on a malicious link from Twitter, they would dial 911 without even realising. When weaponised, this could allow callers to repeatedly dial 911 without knowing, clogging up call centres and putting lives at risk.


Obviously, this was very bad. As a result, there is now a change in iOS 10.3 that requires users to always hit a confirmation before dialling a call can take place.


The Wall Street Journal, which also did an in-depth report on how the 911 attack took place, explains Apple’s approach to solving the problem:



Apple says it initially worked with app developers to fix the vulnerability, and this update will now prevent it from happening even on apps that hadn’t already fixed the issue.



Mobile networks and phone makers are having to grapple with various attacks targeting the 911 system. Earlier this month, “ghost calls” made from T-Mobile phones flooded 911 call centres in Texas. That attack has been linked with two deaths; the cause of those attacks still isn’t known. AT&T customers also faced 911 outages in more than a dozen US states this month.


The iOS update obviously fixes this specific problem, but larger infrastructural problems with the 911 system (and the lack of security to prevent automated attacks) still exist. The Journal reports that the Department of Homeland Security is working on ways to identify and block calls aimed at taking down the 911 system. [Wall Street Journal via Cult of Mac]